The
net.

Put the two maps together and subtract. In fiscal 2025, 28 of the 51 states-and-DC received more federal award spending than their taxpayers sent in, and 23 sent in more than came back — a gap that exists because not all federal spending lands in a state, and not all of it is award spending at all.

The Money Maps · 3 of 3 · Fiscal year 2025

The snapshot

FY2025fiscal year (Oct 2024 – Sep 2025)
28of 51 received more than they gave
23of 51 gave more than they received
−$103.5B50 states + DC net (see methodology)

The map

A tile map — every state gets one equal tile, so small states stay readable. Tiles are colored per person, not in totals: a big state is not automatically a big giver. Hover any tile for its figures. The full table is below.

gives over $6,875 more per persongives $2,382 – $6,875 moregives up to $2,381 moregets up to $3,763 moregets $3,764 – $10,217 moregets over $10,217 more per personNot published— net per person

The figures

Every state and DC, ranked by net per person — positive means the state received more than it gave. Read the methodology panel before quoting any single state, especially the six flagged there.

#StateTaxes givenper personSpending receivedper personNetper person
1North Dakota$10.3B$13,200$98.4B$126,335$88.1B$113,135
2Kentucky$54.0B$11,980$173.4B$38,487$119.4B$26,507
3Connecticut$75.7B$20,998$153.6B$42,602$77.9B$21,604
4Minnesota$126.3B$22,126$242.1B$42,432$115.9B$20,306
5Indiana$82.7B$12,184$207.1B$30,518$124.4B$18,334
6South Carolina$44.5B$8,702$137.1B$26,794$92.6B$18,092
7Alaska$7.9B$10,773$18.5B$25,162$10.6B$14,388
8New Mexico$13.9B$6,563$41.5B$19,584$27.6B$13,021
9District of Columbia$41.7B$60,424$48.9B$70,951$7.3B$10,526
10Virginia$125.9B$14,592$214.1B$24,808$88.2B$10,217
11Puerto Rico$5.5B$1,686$38.4B$11,697$32.9B$10,010
12West Virginia$9.3B$5,208$23.8B$13,293$14.5B$8,086
13Mississippi$16.2B$5,458$38.6B$13,029$22.4B$7,572
14Pennsylvania$188.9B$14,529$281.6B$21,655$92.7B$7,126
15Hawaii$12.5B$8,577$22.7B$15,569$10.2B$6,992
16Maine$13.2B$9,696$22.0B$16,168$8.8B$6,472
17Alabama$39.6B$7,873$71.6B$14,248$32.0B$6,375
18Wisconsin$76.4B$12,957$113.0B$19,166$36.6B$6,209
19Arizona$81.7B$11,425$112.5B$15,737$30.8B$4,312
20Tennessee$94.3B$13,649$121.4B$17,564$27.1B$3,915
21Vermont$6.5B$10,032$8.9B$13,795$2.4B$3,763
22Oklahoma$39.1B$9,886$50.3B$12,695$11.1B$2,808
23Oregon$45.5B$10,742$57.2B$13,507$11.7B$2,765
24Idaho$18.5B$10,040$22.9B$12,440$4.4B$2,399
25Maryland$94.4B$15,285$105.7B$17,107$11.3B$1,822
26Michigan$111.9B$11,107$126.4B$12,540$14.4B$1,433
27Louisiana$58.0B$12,457$59.8B$12,844$1.8B$388
28Montana$15.0B$13,800$15.4B$14,173$404.3M$373
29North Carolina$127.9B$12,249$129.5B$12,404$1.6B$155
30Iowa$36.7B$11,513$36.5B$11,448−$207.5M−$65
31Missouri$94.9B$15,426$93.7B$15,227−$1.2B−$199
32New Hampshire$17.9B$12,990$17.0B$12,358−$871.6M−$633
33Kansas$33.4B$11,375$31.1B$10,571−$2.4B−$805
34Florida$358.0B$16,620$325.0B$15,091−$32.9B−$1,529
35Nevada$38.7B$12,481$34.0B$10,944−$4.8B−$1,537
36Arkansas$42.0B$13,944$35.0B$11,609−$7.0B−$2,335
37Rhode Island$17.8B$16,179$15.1B$13,798−$2.6B−$2,381
38Wyoming$8.6B$14,858$7.0B$12,122−$1.6B−$2,736
39South Dakota$14.4B$16,247$11.5B$12,971−$2.9B−$3,276
40Georgia$145.1B$13,545$105.9B$9,885−$39.2B−$3,659
41Utah$43.0B$13,147$29.1B$8,898−$13.9B−$4,249
42Colorado$96.6B$16,736$69.8B$12,086−$26.8B−$4,650
43Texas$479.5B$16,453$311.5B$10,689−$168.0B−$5,763
44Ohio$210.2B$17,814$129.1B$10,940−$81.1B−$6,875
45California$766.5B$19,387$485.8B$12,286−$280.8B−$7,102
46Illinois$227.7B$17,772$134.6B$10,507−$93.1B−$7,265
47New York$411.4B$20,363$262.2B$12,980−$149.1B−$7,383
48Nebraska$44.2B$22,514$27.8B$14,150−$16.4B−$8,364
49Delaware$22.2B$22,451$12.2B$12,364−$10.0B−$10,087
50New Jersey$192.1B$20,679$96.6B$10,395−$95.5B−$10,285
51Washington$172.3B$22,361$89.6B$11,622−$82.7B−$10,738
52Massachusetts$179.8B$25,571$103.3B$14,690−$76.5B−$10,882
53GuamNot publishedNot published$4.9B$31,555Not publishedNot published
54U.S. Virgin IslandsNot publishedNot published$10.7B$123,201Not publishedNot published
55American SamoaNot publishedNot published$586.2M$11,793Not publishedNot published
56Northern Mariana IslandsNot publishedNot published$178.7M$3,775Not publishedNot published

Methodology — read this before quoting the numbers

Year. Federal fiscal year 2025 — October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025 — the most recent complete fiscal year published by both sources. Per-person figures divide by the Census population estimates USASpending publishes with its state data.

Taxes given are the IRS's gross collections (Data Book Table 5, fiscal year 2025): every federal tax the IRS collected, before refunds, attributed to the state of the taxpayer's address — for businesses, the state of the principal office. Delaware therefore carries corporate collections out of proportion to its size; that is how the IRS itself attributes them, and we print it as published.

Spending received is USASpending's federal award spending for fiscal year 2025 by place of performance: contracts, grants, direct payments (Social Security, Medicare, federal retirement and other benefits), loans and insurance, as recorded in the federal award data. It is award spending, not every dollar of the federal budget — interest on the national debt and some direct federal operations are not attributed to states in the award data, which is one reason the 50-state-and-DC spending total ($5.18T) sits below the tax total ($5.28T) even before anything is spent overseas.

Read six states with care. Medicare's fee-for-service payments are processed by regional administrative contractors, and USASpending books those bulk payments where the contractor sits — Fargo, North Dakota (Noridian) most extremely, and also Indiana, Minnesota, Connecticut, Kentucky and Wisconsin. Those states' "spending received" — and therefore their net — comes out far higher than the money that actually lands with their residents. The figures are printed exactly as USASpending publishes them. North Dakota is the extreme case: about $94B of its $98B is Medicare payments processed in Fargo on behalf of beneficiaries nationwide.

Territories. The IRS does not publish separate collection figures for Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa or the Northern Mariana Islands — they are combined with overseas military collections in a single line — so their taxes and net read "Not published." Their federal spending is published and shown. Puerto Rico is published by both sources and included in full. Figures are never estimated: where a source doesn't publish a number, the table says so.

This map's construction. Net = spending received (USASpending, fiscal 2025, place of performance) minus taxes given (IRS gross collections, fiscal 2025). The two sources were never designed to be subtracted — the IRS attributes taxes by taxpayer address, USASpending attributes spending by where the work or benefit is processed — so the net is best read as the shape of the two published flows, not as a bank statement. A state can "give" more than it "gets" here while still hosting federal payrolls and facilities the award data books elsewhere, or not at all.

← Back to What's Being Built